Wednesday 17 June 2015

Caste System


Caste system with different name is there in every religion and community all over the globe. Sects/denominations - hierarchical social order is not unique to Hinduism and India.

"Christianity Today" says there are “approximately 38,000″ Christian sects/denominations.
Most of them have separate Churches, do not inter-marry, do not even visit each others' Churches. There have been several cases of community boycott when couple of different sects has inter-married.

Only recently a Bishop has openly said that inter-caste marriages are against Christianity.



Muslims also have unchi jaat and neechi jaat (Biraderis/Quoms). Upon contact with a low-caste Muslim, a Muslim of a higher jaat can "purify" by taking a short bath. Lower casts in Muslims include - Kunjra, Dhobi, Halalkhor, kalal, Bhanar, Halalkhor, Hijra, Kasbi, Lalbegi, Maugta, Mehtar. 

In Bihar, cases have been reported where higher-caste Muslims have opposed the burials of lower caste Muslims in the same graveyard.

They refuse to marry outside their own respective castes, and in this they are no less strict and particular than the Hindus, honor killings are more rampant & brutal than Hindus, when inter-caste marriages happen.

It is high time we demand that Indian media starts acknowledging the facts in an unbiased manner.
It is time the mainstream media learns to respect all religions equally. Social evils exist in all religions - targeting only Sanatana Dharma will serve in further dividing the country.

If we want to fight this social evil, we have to first acknowledge that it effects all communities and religions in our country. It is not the problem of only one religion. We all have to unite and fight this evil together.

The next generation of Indians has to unite and stop this discrimination against the Hindu community.


Wednesday 10 June 2015

33 Vedic Devas




According to Vedas there are 33 Gods/Devas. These deities are separated in the following pattern : 12 + 11 + 8 + 2. 

12 is the number of Adityas, 11 are the number of Rudras, 8 is the number of Vasus, one is Prajapati, the Master of Gods, and one is a Supreme Ruler who is very powerful. 

12 Adityas (personified deities) correspond to the 12 Solar months and represent different attributes of social life. The ancients especially venerated the Adityas and Vedas are full of hymns dedicated to Indra, Agni, Surya, Varun and the like. These are:

1.       Indra/Shakra (eldest and the undoubted leader of other Adityas)
2.       Ansh (due share),
3.       Aryaman (nobility),
4.       Bhaag (due inheritance),
5.       Dhatri (ritual skill),
6.       Tvashtar (skill in crafting),
7.       Mitra (friendship),
8.       Pushan/Ravi (prosperity),
9.       Savitra/Parjanya (power of word),
10.   Surya/Vivasvan (social law),
11.   Varun (fate),
12.  Vaman (cosmic law).

8 Vasus are attendant deities of Indra and comprise of eight elemental gods that represent the different aspects of Nature. They are:

1.       Anil (Wind),
2.       Apas (Water),
3.       Antariksh/Dyaus (Space),
4.       Dhara (Earth),
5.       Dhruv (Pole Star),
6.       Anal (Fire),
7.       Prabhas (Dawn),
8.       Soma (Moon).


11 Rudras:
·         5 abstractions – Ānanda (bliss), Vijñāna (knowledge), Manas (thought), Prāṇa (breath/ life), Vāc (speech),
·         5 names of Shiva – Isana (ruler), Tatpuruṣa (that person), Aghora (not terrible), Vāmadeva (pleasant god), Sadyojāta (born at once)
·         1 - Aatman (spiritual self)

In the Brihadaranyaka Upanishad, the 11 Rudras are represented by ten vital energies (rudra-prana) in the body and the eleventh one being the Aatman:

katame rudrA iti |
dasheme purushhe prANA
AtmaikAdashas
te yadA.asmAchchharIrAnmartyAdutkrAmanty
atha rodayanti
tadyadrodayanti
tasmAdrudrA iti || 4 ||


- ‘Which are the Rudras ?’ ‘The ten organs in the human body, with the prana as the tenth and the Aatma as the eleventh. When they depart from this mortal body, they make (one’s relatives) weep. Because they then make them weep, therefore they are called Rudras.’ -  Brihadaranyaka Upanishad III-ix-4: ‘

There is a prevalent myth that Hindus have 33 million Gods and Goddesses. ’33 Crore Gods’ is a completely misinterpreted fact due to wrong translation of Vedas by certain foreign 'scholars'.

The term ‘trayastrimsati koti’ mentioned in Atharva Veda, Yajur Veda, and Satapatha-brahmana, is rightly translated as 33 Gods.

The term koti in Sanskrit has two meaning, one is ‘type’ and the other is crore.

So, somewhere in translation, they missed the basic fact that Sanatana Dharma/Hinduism has 33 Supreme Gods and not 33 Crore Gods.


But because 1). the 33 names are listed, and 2). 33 Deva figure is repeated in various other scriptures like the Ramayana, Mahabharata (Bhagwad Gita) as well; hence there is no room for confusion.

Nevertheless, it is true that the Vedic Sanskrit is different from the normal spoken Sanskrit, hence the major (both intentional & unintentional) mistakes happen in interpreting the Vedas.

It is sad that even basic words are wrongly translated by some western 'scholars' and we Indians have no interest in our own scriptures. We respect the western scholars even more than our Vedic scholars.



Feminism

I don't call myself a Feminist anymore, because I have seen how people misuse and abuse this term. 

A lot of times, women and women group confuse it with female chauvinism. I have seen women misusing 'freedom' and 'choice' in the name of feminism; their choices should be respected, but if the man chooses to do the same - he should be judged.

If both genders are equal - then how can only one gender demand special rights and privileges? 

There are countless such examples:

- If a woman slaps a man - he deserved it. But if a man slaps a woman - he is monster.
- If a woman abandons her children, it was her choice and she demands respect for it. But if a man abandons his children - he should be punished.
- If women have extra marital affair - it is their 'privilege', because her husband is a lousy jerk. But if the man has an extra-marital affair - he is a male chauvinist pig.
- If a woman shares a sexist joke making fun of men - it is acceptable and funny. But if a man makes a sexists joke - Oh! What a bumpkin!





The term feminism is often abused by women when they demand certain special rights - even while they claim they are equal. For these reasons, it is often misunderstood by men also.

When I had first heard of this term 'feminism', I was an adolescent. I remember even then, I had wondered - why this terminology was accepted by any sane person?



If people want to fight the patriarchy in the contemporary society, and demand equal rights for both genders, then the movement should be called 'Equalism' or simply human rights movement - because both genders suffer from stereotypes in patriarchy.

Patriarchy rules often tend to create suffocating roles for both men and women – men can’t cry, men shouldn’t be emotional, men cannot take care of children, men cannot love a child more than a woman, men should not take care of household chores, men should earn insane amount of money, man should be physically strong, men who dance are gay – there are endless examples of strict patriarchal effect men’s happiness and limits their growth as human being.

Both feminine and masculine qualities in a human being need to be equally respected. But they way ‘feminism’ is (mis)used – I don’t see that happening.

Neither gender is superior, both genders have their own set of weaknesses and strengths. I am for equal human rights, I am against special privileges to either gender. 

I have realized that one cannot fight patriarchy effectively by female chauvinism, and hence I am not a 'Feminist' anymore.


Sanatana Dharma


"At the earlier stages of spiritual evolution and metaphysical thought the Vedas mention the names of various gods and goddesses: Mitra, the Sun; Varuna, the god of night and of the blue sky; Dyu and Prithivi, the Sky and the Earth; Agni or fire god, the friend of all; Savitri, the Refulgent; Indra, the master of the universe; and Aditi, the mother of all other gods (the Adityas). Gradually, however, we come across a tendency towards extolling a God as the greatest, controlling all other divine entities. This marks the progress of the concept of God or the ultimate Reality from polytheism to monotheism, ultimately leading to monism."
- Swami Tattwamayananda


The first mandala of the Rig Veda brings out this idea most beautifully: ‘God is called Indra, Mitra, Varuna, Agni, and God is the heavenly, noble-winged Garutman. The Reality is one, but sages call it by many names; they call it Agni, Yama, Matarishvan.’ (1.164.46)





The idea that names may be many and different but they all denote the one God occurs in ‘Vishvakarma Sukta’ too. Therein it is stated: ‘The name-giver of the gods is one; other beings come to him to inquire.’ (10.82.3)

Scope of Sanatana Dharma 

It has been difficult for the Westerners (and others) to understand the essence of Sanatana Dharma because it cannot be put in the West-defined categories of polytheism, pantheism, and monotheism etc.

The scope of some religions in this world can be fit according to these parameters and they can be defined and understood using these terms, but some cannot be fit into these limited definitions.

To understand Sanatana (eternal) Dharma/‘Hinduism’, one needs to realize that it is all encompassing – there is even scope for non-existentialism and atheism in the scriptures – then how can we make it fit into a category?

The ancient scriptures of Sanatana Dharma are of two kinds – Shruti and Smṛti.

1. Shruti is considered to be solely of divine origin. It includes the four Vedas (Rigveda, Yajurveda, Samaveda and Atharvaveda) the Brahmanas, the Aranyakas and the Upanishads with commentaries on them.

The Shrutis present a kind of naturalistic polytheism; with the main Gods appear as fire, sun, wind etc. The major Vedic deities/Gods are - Indra, Surya, Agni, Vayu, Varuna, Mitra, Aditi, Yama, Soma, Sarasvati, Prithvi, and Rudra. Mostly worshiping the various life-giving elements and energies of nature, which play a crucial role in nurturing life forms on the planet and beyond. But Upanishads also talk about the Unity of Consciousness.

2. Smṛti refers to all the knowledge derived and inculcated after Shruti had been received.
Hence, Smrti is not considered 'divine' in origin, but was 'remembered' by later Rishis (sages by insight, who were the scribes) by transcendental means and passed down through their followers. 
It is in the Smritis that the holy trinity of Brahma, Vishnu and Mahesh seems to appear. It includes the Bhagavata Purana and the Vishnu Purana which are Sattva Puranas. For example these both declare Vishnu as Para Brahman Supreme Lord who creates unlimited universes and enters each one of them as Lord of Universe.

Hence, we can observe that at one point, some scriptures – like the Vedas (Shruti) proclaim a kind of pantheistic polytheism – the natural elements and energies – like fire (Agni Dev), earth (Dhara Devi), wind (Anil Dev)– are worshiped as personified Gods/Goddesses.

At one point – monotheistic principles surface – especially in Vedanta Darshana (Upanishads, also Shruti) with the concept of Unity of Consciousness deeply imbibed in it.

In various Purana (Smriti) – polytheism again resurfaces, even though it defies the strict definition of polytheism because same Truth is manifested in seemingly large number of Gods and Goddesses

Deity Worship

As far as the psychology of deity or idol worship is concerned – these idols, images and symbols - help most people in focusing their concentration, and hence the practical usage cannot be questioned.

That is why most Gods – even in pantheistic religions (fire god, water deity etc.) – are personified.
The human mind can feel closer to images than abstract ideas.

Moreover, this provides people the liberty to select one's deity (Ishta Devta) according to one's personality and inclination

Core values

Following are some of the core fundamentals of Hindu faith/Sanatana Dharma:

v   There is a one, all-pervasive Supreme Being (Paramatma/Brahm) who is both immanent & transcendent, both Creator and Unmanifest Reality.

v    There are many paths to reach the Truth, thus, all religions/faiths are genuine paths to attain Paramatma, deserving respect and understanding. Within Sanatana Dharma also, there are several path to select according to one's inclination to attain Mukti - Karma Yog, Jap Yog, Gyan Yog, Raj Yog, Bhakti Yog, Lay Yog among other paths.

v    Karma is the law of cause & effect by which each individual creates his/her own destiny by thoughts, words & actions.

v    Aatma (part of Paramatma) or Soul reincarnates, is indestructible, immortal, eternal; goes through many births until all karmas have been resolved, and Mukti (liberation) from the cycle of rebirth, is attained. Not a single soul will be deprived of this destiny.

v    ALL life forms are sacred, to be loved & revered, so you have to follow Ahimsa - non-injury.

v    Divinity exists in unseen worlds and temple worship, rituals, sacraments & personal devotions can help in connecting with God. Thus God can be worshiped in many forms - as Krishna, Ganesha, Kaali, Durga, Shiva, or any other form/name. 

v   Maya - "ब्रह्म सत्यम, जगत्‌ मिथ्या" - The experience of this world is not absolute reality. No one reality exists - each individual has his/her own subjective world-view of the reality. Truth starts surfacing only as we get closer to Paramatma; Brahm is the ultimate reality, and without knowing this Truth, one cannot find reality. 


It is time that we start understanding our own culture and start reading our scriptures. 

It is time we stop defending our faith and way of life in front of others, and try to be more sincere followers of our revered heritage.


It is time we inculcate the values of self-respect and knowledge - in ourselves and in our children.




Tuesday 9 June 2015

Atheism/Theism


Logically and factually, the thought patterns of both theists/believers and atheists/non-believers are based on things which they cannot prove.

Neither a believer can prove there is God, nor can a non-believer prove that there is no God.

Yet both are adamant and dogmatic, and unable to take a non-judgmental approach to the others point of view. The fanatics of both kinds adapt a holier-than-thou (I am better/Superior than you) attitude.

The fanatic believer says - build places of worship everywhere; the fanatic non-believer says - ban all places of worship. 
The fanatic believer says – there is God everywhere; the fanatic non-believer says – there is no God.




Both kind of extremism is equal in taking sides and creating hurdles in the path of peace.

If we want people to live in peace and work productively - we need a sound education system and good parenting techniques in place - so that we can create humans who know how to respect each other's opinions.

Why is the focus only on raising humans who are skilled at something and can make money - but are not respectful towards people with differing views?

Thursday 4 June 2015

Bhagwad Gita


Bhagwad Gita

The first time I had the good luck to read Bhagwad Gita (in Hindi and English translation) was when I was about 16 years old.

I belong to a culture, where almost every other house, including my own, had the following 'Gita Saar' (essence of the Gita) chart hung on the living room wall.



For those who cannot read Hindi, following is a translation in English:

  • whatever happened was good
  • whatever is happening is good
  • whatever will happen will also be good
  • what have you parted with that makes you cry ?
  • what did you bring with you that you have lost ?
  • what did you create which is now destroyed ?
  • what you have taken, you have taken only from here.
  • what was given was given only from here.
  • what is yours today, was someone else's yesterday, will be someone else's tomorrow.
  • change is the law of the universe
English Translation Source: cs.stanford.edu/~sbansal/geeta_saar

As a child, when I used to meditate on its meaning it used to sound like a strange philosophy which attracted me immensely, even though I used to find it difficult. But it continued to hold a huge impact on me and I liked to read it over and over again.

I used to wonder, how is it possible not to worry over the things which bother us! I was excessively emotional and sensitive to the happenings around me. Like most children, both loving words and cruel scolding by either parents or teachers had intense effect on me. I could be joyful enough to shout out aloud, or weep for hours together!

As I grew older, became an adolescent, the philosophy of Bhagwad Gita began to attract me even more, and I asked my father if I could read his copy of Bhagwad Gita.

It was a very simple, basic translation in English and Hindi. I was a voracious reader and immersed myself in it for days; making notes on the margins of pages wherever I had queries. I was immensely impressed by most of it, as much as I could understand it that time. By the time I finished reading it, I had a ton of questions.

My father satisfactorily answered a lot of them, but there were still 40% of my doubts which were outside the sphere of his understanding too. One of my Bengali friends’ maternal aunt was a Sanskrit professor. I went to her, with Bhagwad Gita and a notebook and a pencil, seeking answers. But even she couldn’t clear all my doubts.

But within few months I gave up, and my mind full of queries and uncertainties about the philosophy of Gita. Soon I got distracted, and started reading Swami Vivekananda, whose simpler language and charged up words excited my temperament much more and I devoted my time in reading his works.

The second time I read Bhagwad Gita was when I had crossed the age of 30. Since then, it has helped me cope with Depression, and overcome my insecurities and has had a positive impact on my self-image. In short, it has had profound effect on me.

Now I can clearly see that it aims at a complete cognitive restructuring (CR) of the reader's mind. CR is a technique where we learn to recognize the faulty or wrong notions created in the deep recesses of our minds, and try to alter them with the right thought patterns.

Quite understandably, the wrongs patterns of thinking are those which hurt us emotionally or make us unhappy, and the right thinking patterns are the ones which pull us out of unhappiness and lead us towards a happier, more productive life.

In contemporary times, when materialism and individualism are taking over human lives, stress is everywhere. It is the constant companion of even those who have no shortage of money, fame, beauty and power.

The way Bhagwad Gita works on human psyche, in my personal experience (especially if read under the guidance of a good Guru/scholar), it can be beneficial in multiple ways.
Some of circumstances when psychologists or community leaders can make use of Gita as a tool to alleviate unhappiness in people are:

Ø  Loss of a family member or loved one.
Ø  Lack of motivation, in work place, school/college, or generally in carrying out duties of daily life.
Ø  Finding a meaning or purpose in life.
Ø  Exploring philosophical approaches to life.
Ø  Helping children in teaching positive cognitive mindset which can help curb the suicide rates and adolescent Depression.
Ø  Leading a more fulfilled and contented life.
Ø  Cognitive restructuring to face life-crisis with healthy attitude.
Ø  Enhancing skills to give one’s best at one’s talents.
Ø  Helping soldiers coping with PTSD (post traumatic stress disorder).
Ø  Rehabilitation work (drug addicts, adolescent delinquents)

Let me quote some famous quotes on Geeta, from the prominent world figures:

Wilhelm von Humboldt, the Prussian philosopher & founder of the Humboldt University of Berlin, pronounced the Bhagwad Gita as: "The most beautiful, perhaps the only true philosophical song existing in any known tongue ... perhaps the deepest and loftiest thing the world has to show."
Source: The Episode of the Mahabharata Known by the Name Bhagavad-Gita (On Hegel's review of Wilhelm von Humboldt's lectures on the Bhagavad-Gita). By G. W. F. Hegel, 1827

Henry David Thoreau, the American author, poet, philosopher and historian wrote, “In the morning I bathe my intellect in the stupendous and cosmogonal philosophy of the Bhagavad Gita in comparison with which our modern world and its literature seem puny and trivial."
Source: The Bhagavad-Gita by  Barbara Miller

Ralph Waldo Emerson, the American thinker and poet who led the Transcendentalist movement of the mid-19th century was strongly influenced by the philosophy of Bhagavad Gita and Vedanta in general, "I owed a magnificent day to the Bhagavad-Gita. It was as if an empire spoke to us, nothing small or unworthy, but large, serene, consistent, the voice of an old intelligence which in another age and climate had pondered and thus disposed of the same questions which exercise us."
Source: The Bhagavad-Gita by  Barbara Miller

“It (Bhagavad-Gita) is one of the great classics of world literature, it has inspired such diverse thinkers as Henry David Thoreau, Mahatma Gandhi, and T.S. Eliot.”
Source: The Bhagavad-Gita by  Barbara Miller

The first governor general of British India Warren Hastings wrote: "I hesitate not to pronounce the Gita a performance of great originality, of sublimity of conception, reasoning and diction almost unequalled; and a single exception, amongst all the known religions of mankind." 

“It was Warren Hastings who encouraged Charles Wilkins to translate the Bhagwad Gita in 1785.”
Source: Brahma in the West: William Blake and the Oriental Renaissance by David Weir

It was Charles Wilkins’ translation of the Gita which was soon translated into French (1787) and German (1802). It proved to be a major influence on Romantic literature and on European perception of Hindu philosophy. William Blake later celebrated the publication in his picture The Bramins, exhibited in 1809, which depicted Wilkins and Brahmin scholars working on the translation. 
Source: wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_Wilkins

Thus, we can see that Bhagwad Gita has influenced major philosophers and thinkers of the world, and they have been in awe of the philosophy ever since. It is a matter of great pity if the country where it originated, should not respect and understand its significance.

In Bharat, not just for spiritual purposes, but also for practical purposes, it can be and must be used as an efficient tool in order to improve the quality of life in several ways.

It can be especially beneficial in the field of education and psychology, where it is imperative to give education on how to deal with stress and various life-situations. 

The study of Gita is crucial if we want the children – who are the future of our nation and world – to be mentally prepared for life and want them to imbibe positive and healthy attitudes.

It is sincerely hoped that the professionals in various fields recognize the potential which this ancient classical text holds for us, and work towards applying its principles in modern Bhartiya (Indian) life.